Skip to main content
Home
Home > Teaching with Technology > Blog Central
A global blog for instructional technology issues in BVSD.
Promoting Online Literacy
Two great articles about online literacy to challenge educators and help empower students: • "Authority" vs. Wikipedia: http://melaniemcbride.net/2009/11/07/authority-v-wikipedia-why-teachers-are-picking-the-wrong-fight/ • Crap Detection 101: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/rheingold/detail?entry_id=42805#ixzz0WrD4odNB
An Introduction to Future Talk

Last week, I had the privilege to travel to the headquarters of Texas Instruments (TI) in Dallas, TX. The occasion was guided by the notion of assembling a few leading school districts, gaining a glimpse of the future of projector technology in the classroom, and engaging in an actionable pilot using some of these future technologies. You see, TI makes the famed DLP chips that are part of projectors in classrooms and movie theaters across the country. TI doesn’t make the projector, itself—but they do own a voice in the technical fabric of what projectors have been able to do and will be able to do in the future.

 

This is no small enterprise, by the way. Largely recession proof, growth in the educational projector market represents the largest, most profitable, and most promising part of TI’s business for the foreseeable future.

 

In this blog, I plan to address, in a BVSD context, the question: “What will the future of projector technology bring to teaching and learning?” The following themes will serve to guide our discussions:

 

ü  The future of projectors (Part I – 3d teaching and learning)

ü  The future of projectors (Part II – the evolving tool)

ü  Piloting 3d learning in BVSD

ü  Future-proofing the classroom: the BVSD Projector Initiative

ü  Best practices in teaching with visual learning tools

 

BVSD employees are encouraged to contribute, question, and imagine by taking an active role in this blog.

NSBA Conference Planner now available
GO to this website and start planning:
 
 
What if I haven't registered yet?
If you have not yet registered for the NSBA T&L conference, please wait a day or so for full instructions. Today, we released the 3a Tech Professional Development monies to schools (they have to be placed into accounts) and this was needed as the first step.
 
I will then post instructions here on how to register for the conference using special BVSD codes. I will also post info on how to change attendee names, if a change took place at your school.
Conference Schedule
The NSBA conference schedule has been posted at http://www.nsba.org/tl/Schedule/
 
Please take a look. It may affect your plans, schedule, bus, or carpool decisions.
Conference Update

October 2009 NSBA T+L Conference, as discussed in detail in our previous tech contact meetings, is coming up soon. Here are some details.

 

When and Where:

2009 T+L Conference
October 28-30, 2009 (only the two full day sessions are the essential ones to attend—October 28 & 29)

Colorado Convention Center
Denver, Colorado

 

To get more information about the conference, go to this website.

http://www.nsba.org/tl/

 

For BVSD registration processes, contact len.scrogan@bvsd.org

 

Watch for more details, because we are sending more than 100 teachers, staff, principals, board members and community members. We will have a special room to gather and share ideas on the second day, in the late afternoon. Subs can be paid for from your building professional development funds, which we have not released yet, but will soon. Stay tuned!

 

The New Digital Divide
Gartner, an internationally respected I.T. consulting firm, recently announced the uneasy appearance of a new Digital Divide. One that represents a formidable challenge in the equity landscape of schools, technology, and learning.
 
Whereas the previous Digial Divide was in explained in terms of students and schools having inequitable ACCESS to technology resources, this newly shaping Digital Divide is quite different. And this one really matters.
 
A new Digital Divide is surfacing, one which suggest there is a widening gap between schools that are just using technology and those schools that are using technology effectively to achieve learning results. Having versus producing. Deploying versus making a difference. Using versus producing. What do you think?
 
P.S. If you are interested in some assessment tools that can help you analyze where your school is at in this regard, take a look at these two:
 
 
The Evolution of the Interactive Whiteboard - Part Dieux

The wall-sized electronic whiteboard has been a familiar technology tool in many schools across the country. (If you don’t know what an interactive whiteboard is, check out this link:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_whiteboard )

 

The Large IWB

Although interactive whiteboards have experienced  limited traction in BVSD schools, they have remained the glossy ‘bandwagon’ educational technology of the last decade. Now, after lackluster research related to effectiveness, a lengthy learning curve, the lack of use in many schools that already own them, and some new developments in the field, their presence is not likely to grow. But don’t feel badly. Although it will not prove to be an enduring investment, the Interactive whiteboard (IWB) has been a very worthwhile pioneering investment.

There are seven reasons why this venerable technology will soon go the way of the triceratops, the beta max, and the rotary dial phone:

1. The per-classroom cost remains high and largely unattainable

2. The durability / replacement issue is always a concern

3. The learning curve is high (2 years for teachers to use before effectiveness is reached, based on the research)

4. It lends itself more to secondary, more directive teaching styles

5. Industry insiders and technology mavens confidentially agree that the wall-sized IWB is nearing end of life; it won’t last. Still, companies need to meet waning demand and clear existing inventories.

6. The wall-sized IWB lacks the flexibility of movement and adaptability

7. New technologies are looming:  the larger IWBs are positioned to be replaced by smaller, personal tablets, like the Mobi.  More people can use them (up to 7-8 in a class), and students/teachers can use them at their seats or anywhere in the room. Also, instead of students taking turns up front, this smaller device permits students and teachers to explore varied uses, including cooperative groupings. This smaller tablet does everything that its older, larger brother does, at 1/5th the price and without losing precious K-12 real-estate--wall space.

The Mobi tablet

In short—sustainability issues, instructional limitedness, and a new replacement technology—will soon usher the larger IWB into the halls of forgotten technologies. Every major IWB company is now making this shift, as can be seen from the picture below:

And a hot new update.... you heard it here first.... the next generation beyond the tablet IWB is being shown in private meetings now. And it isn't in the whiteboard--and it isn't in the tablet--and it isn't in the computer--it's in the projector! Our new BVSD projectors have a built-in 3d capability that will enable a special pen to run any software like a smartboard--- but using the 3d chip and receivers in the projector. That may be a year or less away, but the implications are significant. IWB capability built into the projector. The many IWB companies will likely survive by licensing this technology and promoting their IWB software instead.

Any thoughts?

NSBA and NECC coming to Denver!
The news startled me and shook me to the core. The national NSBA technology conference is coming to Denver next October. And the national NECC conference is coming to Denver in June 2010.
 
Nearly 4-5 years ago, the NSBA conference was in Denver for two years in a row and we sent a team of nearly 50 BVSD teachers and administrators (and Board members) to both conferences.  The visioning created by our teachers at these conferences was long sustained, still contributing to our current and future priorities. That's where teachers first saw Pixie, Video Streaming, and many other resources and approaches that are making their way into BVSD at this time.
 
So this begs the question: How can we plan now for this two-year seismic event to most benefit our teachers, classrooms, and students. Do you have any creative ideas, wishes, or wants given this new announcement. 
 
--Len
Digital Video Cameras for Schools
Well, I have been doing a lot of research lately about best solutions for video camera purchases for classroom use. And in doing so, I discovered some interesting trends and findings. I would like to share those findings now.
 
I believe that the video camera world is rapidly transitioning away from the Mini-DV tape format (oldest), past the mini-DVD media (older - a less successful technology that aimed to save to a mini-DVD disc in the camera), past the more expensive hard drive digital movie camera (old - an expensive hard drive is placed within the vidcam) to new FLASH-based video cameras.
 
At the low end, the new FLIP cameras ($90-$150) are storming the market. But these cameras, passable for classrooms on a very tight budget, lack in the area of lighting and stability/quality of image/sound.  A more appropriate purchase is the next level up flash-based video cam. After scanning hundreds of owner reviews, it apparent that the Canon series FS 100, FS 10 and FS 11 may be the best fit for the classroom.
 

CNaon FS 10

The Canon series cameras have the highest consumer ratings so far on the market for quality and reliability. They use the little SD flash disks (4 gig = 1 hour of video), and some models have built in flash memory on top of that. They offer point and shoot excellence and good sound capabilities. On the negative side, you will need good lighting pre-positioned, unless you are outside. To beat the lighting challenge, you have to go to a higher end camera, period.
 
After reviewing the market, this is clearly where things are headed. I think they are a good investment for schools, because they are more reliable than the mechanical-type tape vidcams.
 
WARNING: These cameras save in .mod file format. This format will play on Windows Movie Player, but has difficulty running within PowerPoint and importing to editors without file conversion to a .wmv or .avi format or other work arounds. Watch a future posting on this blog to learn how to deal with this new file format!
 
If you would like to comment on my blog remarks--or ask a question--please do so!
 
---LEN
 
Please note: these recommendations, along with other recommendations and preferred vendors, can be found on the BVSD standards wiki page. (A link to this page has been provided on the left side of your screen.)

 ‭(Hidden)‬ Admin Links